On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:21 PM, ais523<callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > As far as I can tell, this correctly scams round loopholes in the > proposal's tricks; if the proposal would pass even with an AGAINST from > me, I have no votes AGAINST; and I have ten thousand unconditional votes > FOR, so I'm likely to win as a result (if it passes) unless other people > vote even more FOR votes. (I chose 10000 because it would be reasonable > to write all that 'out by hand' in an email; a larger number like > 1000000 might not be.)
Precedent says 10000 is too high, at least for CFJs :) -- -c.
