ais523 wrote: > On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 13:20 -0500, Pavitra wrote: >> Obviously this would be a socially unacceptable scam, but would it work? >> The only flaw I can see is that a judge might be persuaded to allow >> separate criminal penalties for each illegal draw, but historically that >> hasn't been how we've generally treated bulk crimes. What's the >> difference here? Where do we draw the line? >> > That sort of thing gets punished by proposal.
>> 3. If anyone tries to crim you for the blatant illegality of this >> scam, claim R101(vi). Such a proposal would have to be high-Power enough to override R101(vi). I expect G.'s right about N criminal cases though. It's nice to know that this wouldn't work.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
