On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Roger Hicks <pidge...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is still dispute on that issue. Even if they are broken however > this shouldn't prevent the contract defined mimic of a dependent > action. Worst case it would still work using the common definition of > objection.
Before the last paragraph of R1728 was added, I'd agree. But now contract-defined dependent actions are regulated by the rules, not mimicking them.
