On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > In the absence of this self-ratification, I would interpret that > "PerlNomic" implicitly came to refer to the normish instance as soon as > it was up and the nomic.info instance was down (even without Rainer's > consent), but that c.'s dictatorship was invalid from Agora's > perspective because the other parties had considerably less than 4 days > to review it.
The two players I attempted to mousetrap, ais523 and Wooble, had less than 4 days to review it, but both did explicitly review it (IIRC they both voted against it) before the amendment was made. The other parties can consider themselves not bound if they wish. -- -c.
