On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 13:36 -0700, Charles Reiss wrote: > On 9/15/09 1:49 AM, ais523 wrote: > > Some scams work better when they're kept secret; however, some are > > better when people know they're scams in advance. This message contains > > at least 3 scam attempts; some I think are unlikely to work, some I > > think are considerably more likely. (Further hints: at least one depends > > on the newly-amended wording of rule 2124; exactly one depends on the > > mysterious proposal 6455.) > > > > Note that although there are a lot of intents here (in abbreviated > > form), I don't think it would be impossible to write them out in full, > > although it would spam the lists somewhat. If anyone really insists, I > > will write them out in full and spam the list as a result. > > > > For each public contract (see the list at > > <http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/system:page-tags/tag/public>), I > > intend, without objection; I intend, without member objection; and I > > intend, without 3 objections; to replace its entire text with the > > following: > > Notice of violation: ais523 violated rule 1742 by failing to act in > accordance with the PerlNomic Partnership contract by attempting to > modify it other than by the proposal mechanism.
I contest this; intending to modify it is not attempting to modify it. There are certain contracts (such as Enigma, the PNP, and the IBA) which I don't plan to touch at all with this scam, for ethical reasons. -- ais523
