I considered it to work in the order which maximizes zm, but I guess
to be consistent with previous rulings it should be taken to fail...
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:09 PM, Roger Hicks <pidge...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:38, Jonatanw Kilhamn
<jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> wrote:
For each of those intents (for each of those contracts) I object.
I deposit all my crops and WRV. I IBA-withdraw three Distrib-u-matic,
two Committee and as many Kill Bill as I can afford.
For each public contract that I am a party to, I leave it.
For your deposit, the order in which crops and WRV are deposited
matters significantly when determining your resulting zm. I recommend
that comex reject this deposit for not being specific enough. For AAA
and recordkeeping purposes I am considering it to have failed unless
comex expresses otherwise.
Based on the above deposit failing, here are the results of your
withdraws:
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:38 - Tiger IBA-withdraws 3 Distrib-u-Matic (FAILED
- No Distrib-u-Matic to withdraw)
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:38 - Tiger IBA-withdraws 2 Committee for 60zm
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:38 - Tiger IBA-withdraws 2 Kill Bill for 220zm (as
many as possible)
Contracts you were able to leave: Industrial Bank & Agora, Bob's
Janitorial Service, The Agoran Agricultural Association (causing your
crops and lands to be destroyed)
Contracts you were not able to leave (because they do not provide a
mechanism for you to do so by announcement): C# Party (revised
version), Enigma, Points Party, The Cookie Jar
BobTHJ
