2009/9/18 ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk>: > Arguments: So far there hasn't actually been a situation that needs > resolving. I recommend a null judgement. (As comex says, this CFJ was > submitted for anti-scam reasons (if a situation arises in the future a > judgement to reverse it could then be given), rather than an actual need > to sort out a problem that exists now.)
So lemme get this straight, if we don't like your scam we should use all the tools available to us to prevent it, but we can't use the tools available to us to prevent it?
