On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > Ah, you're right. The other point stands, though; I added RO 4c > to formally allow for latecomers that clearly intended to join, > but the proxy case basically ignored "intent" in RO 2. Which is > fine, it just demonstrates the extent to which consensus can > gloss over formality in their case.
Consensus glosses over formality plenty in Agora, thanks to ratification. But it's a rules-enshrined institution, and that's where the difference is in my mind. Also, re Wooble's comment about BlogNomic, I do not know much about the community there, but a quick glance shows that they seem to care a lot about very exact rules. -coppro
