On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2735 > > =================== CFJ 2735 (Interest Index = 0) ==================== > > This is a CFJ. > > ======================================================================== > > Caller: Murphy > > Judge: c. > Judgement: > > ======================================================================== > > History: > > Called by Murphy: 17 Nov 2009 16:11:48 GMT > Assigned to Yally: 17 Nov 2009 16:14:23 GMT > Yally recused: 06 Dec 2009 22:55:19 GMT > Assigned to c.: (as of this message) > > ======================================================================== > > Gratuitous Evidence by Murphy: > > "Zooping a CFJ" was defined by the now-terminated contract > http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/z-house > > "To zoop a criminal CFJ" is defined by the contract > http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/deleted:redefined-zooping > > "Bobzoops" is/was defined by the contract > http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2009-October/024052.html > > ======================================================================== > > Caller's Arguments: > > zooping isn't really defined in this context, but most > Agorans have a basic idea of what it's meant to mean. Given that I could > just create a CFJ by announcement, what happens here? > > ======================================================================== > > Caller's Evidence: > > I zoop a CFJ on the statement "This is a CFJ." > > ========================================================================
Per CFJ 2736, this CFJ was never initiated.
