On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, comex wrote: > But not announce what the fee is? Full confession: "Fees" is stolen directly from R1941/1-3 (it's all right, I wrote part of it :) ). Collective wisdom was, like maxivote, it was better/ convenient to let people just say "I pay the fee to do X" and have it work.
>> If a Player issues a challenge as above, but more than 7 days >> have passed since the attempted action, then the action shall be >> permitted to stand. As soon as possible after a late challenge >> is issued, the PSM SHALL confirm or deny its correctness. In >> this case the action is considered to have destroyed all ergs >> in the Player's possession at the time. > > This sounds very scammable. Why not just forbid such challenges? Hmm, I think that whole paragraph was early (the first?) self-ratification before self-ratification existed; just making it self-ratifying would work partly. But part of this was to specify that if this happened, we at least zeroed out eir currency, which would have a knock-on effect on what's assumed about attempts later that week. -G.
