On Sun, 7 Feb 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 02/07/2010 09:07 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I veto 6621 (3 ergs) if I can.
>> I veto 6631 (3 ergs) if I can.
>> I make this proposal distributable (1 erg) if I can.
>
> Proposal: Reduce the Recordkeepors' Burden (AI=2, II=1)

Actually, how do you suppose conditionals interact with:
      An attempt to performed a fee-based action is also implicitly a
      claim to be in possession of sufficient ergs to perform the
      action, and such a claim is self-ratifying...Making such a claim 
      falsely is the Class-2 Crime of Assaulting the Batteries...
-G.



Reply via email to