On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 17:17, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/10/2010 11:40 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Ed Murphy wrote: >> >>> coppro violated Rule 1922, a power-1 Rule, by failing to award >>> me the Patent Title Three Months Long Service as soon as >>> possible after I had continuously held the office for three >>> months. >>> >> >> Judgement: >> >> This is straightforward GUILTY - 1 Rest. However, I'll mention >> that it is Rude on behalf of the caller; while the Officer is >> required to track it (and thus can't escape responsibility), it >> is much more reasonable to remind officers of automatically- >> triggered events with long fuses before dinging em. Also, This >> Judge remonstrates the caller for bothering to call a criminal >> case rather than letting it go as an NoV. I think the 1-Rest >> fine is the lightest wrist-slap short of discharge; in the >> current economy it's easier to clear a rest than write an >> apology. -G. >> > > Although I do not fault the judge for this, having just noticed it myself, > I appeal the question of culpability for this case as I did not breach rule > 1922, which imposes no timing requirement on the award. > > -coppro >
Yes, that's what I was getting at when I said it may not have triggered the ASAP clause. Also: http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2010-February/031334.html
