On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 14:18, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Sean Hunt wrote: > > Although I do not fault the judge for this, having just noticed it > myself, I > > appeal the question of culpability for this case as I did not breach rule > 1922, > > which imposes no timing requirement on the award. > > It would be lovely if the caller actually, again, bothered to provide > an argument if there was a legal question rather than just a finding > of fact. Like the previous CFJ that caller Yally handed me, I should > have returned Not Guilty due to lack of evidence provided by caller. > I support the appeal, requesting a REMAND to consider the point of law. > -G. > Now wait a minute. I quoted all the relative rules as evidence when I called the CFJ. I think it's unfair to accuse me thus when it doesn't even seem you considered the evidence I provided to see whether or not coppro committed a crime.
