On Tue, 25 May 2010, comex wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> I've been waiting for this one to come up. Regardless of the judgement >> this is prime place for a legislative clarification. -G. > > (When I wrote the rule text, > I considered specifying that it equals 1,000 votes or something like > that...
Huh. I just noticed that saying "I vote AGAINST. I vote AGAINST." is really voting twice your voting limit. Which means saying "I vote AGAINST twice" is different than saying "I vote 2xAGAINST". Except that saying "I vote 2xAGAINST" is supposedly an unofficial administrative convenience for saying "I vote AGAINST. I vote AGAINST." Hmm. I'm not sure where I'm going with this, but the whole thing seems pretty ambiguous. -G.
