On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:55 +0100, ais523 wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 19:42 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: > > Hmm... I will start the Decision to award a degree after a brief period > > for discussion. > > > > I notice a few minor errors, which is reasonable but I think it would > > have reflected better on the quality had you submitted it for review first. > > > > Most significant is comex's alleged win by Clout, which the Herald's > > records do not contain, and which I personally recall never occurred. > > While I don't have the time to search through the archives myself, is > > there any indication that comex actually won there? > > Looking through the archives, I couldn't see any indication that e > didn't win. There were something like three attempts made; and it's > unclear from the sequence of messages what exactly happened; Yally > attempted to block, but I think CFJ 2767 found that comex's second > attempt worked before Yally could block it. > > On the other hand, the Herald (comex at the time) forgot to actually > announce the win, for whatever reason; perhaps e was waiting for the > result of the CFJ and then forgot it was relevant.
Come to think of it, Agora could really do with BlogNomic-style declarations of victory. (In BlogNomic, everyone votes on whether a win actually happened or not, and then that status is immediately ratified.) I don't think the wins from the do-not-publicly-acknowledge proposal have been processed yet, even though IIRC a CFJ found they happened. -- ais523
