On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, comex wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > So, the Assessor's announcement was not a win announcement. Where does > > that leave us? According to the voting record, comex voted for proposal > > 6740, and this is a clear public acknowledgment of its existence. > > Therefore, comex was not a member of this set (why does everyone think > > that e was? By the Assessor's report it's pretty clear e wasn't): > > It was a blanket vote for.
All such blanket votes are administrative conveniences for individual votes for proposals. Any statement that is taken as applying a vote to a proposal must specify (and thereby acknowledge) that proposal, otherwise the vote would fail. -G.
