coppro wrote:

>> Proposal:  Low altitude
>> (AI = 1, II = 0, distributable by fee)
>>
>> Keba is a co-author of this proposal, unless e announces within a
>> week after the publication of this proposal that e is not.
>>
>> Amend Rule 2287 (Props) by replacing this text:
>>
>>        The Air Traffic Controller is an office and the recordkeepor of
>>        props.
>>
>> with this text:
>>
>>        The Air Traffic Controller is an office and the recordkeepor of
>>        props; prop records are part of eir monthly report.
> 
> a) The proposal just makes them part of the weekly and monthly reports.

Not so.  Rule 2166 (Assets) just says "[The recordkeepor]'s report
includes...".  Rule 2143 (Official Reports and Duties) says

      Any information defined by the rules as part of an office's
      report, without specifying which one, is part of its weekly
      report.

but the proposal would prevent this from being triggered.

> b) You can't have future-conditional actions like that.

You're right, Rule 106 specifies "unambiguously ... when it was
submitted".

Reply via email to