comex wrote: > Well, I disagree with that. It is unreasonable to allow X as an > "administrative convenience" shorthand for Y if nobody, not even the > administrators, know what Y is. > > ...How do fungible assets fit into this scheme?
Depends whether the rules require one to "specify" or merely "indicate". There was an old case where "I transfer all my stuff to <target>" was rejected because the standard was "specify" at the time.
