On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > I opine AFFIRM without prejudice. The original judgement suggests a > precedent that even a disclaimered statement violates Truthiness if you > don't reasonably believe it could be true.
I opine AFFIRM without prejudice for the same reason. —Judicial Panelist Tanner L. Swett
