On 22 September 2010 21:11, Sean Hunt <scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> On 09/22/2010 12:19 PM, Keba wrote:
>>
>> Proposal "No Voting Limit Timing Scams" (AI=2, II=1, distributable via
>> fee)
>> {{{
>> Amend Rule 2279 "Voting Limits on Ordinary Decisions" by replacing
>>
>> Take the Influence Level associated with the player's position
>> on the list of succession, or 5 if the player is the Speaker.
>>
>> with:
>>
>> Take the Influence Level associated with the player's position
>> on the list of succession at the beginning of this week, or 5 if
>> the player is the Speaker.
>>
>> [It would be much easier to track then and it should avoid most timing
>> scams.]
>> }}}
>>
>>
>
> It would not alleviate timing scams in the slightest. Just do it before the
> Sunday during the voting period of the decision, rather than before the end
> of the voting period.
>
> -coppro
>
Woulsn't it remove the Assessor's ability to influence timing scams,
by making eir choice of when to resolve the decision meaningless for
this prupose?
--
-Tiger
