On 09/22/2010 03:49 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
On 22 September 2010 21:11, Sean Hunt<scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
On 09/22/2010 12:19 PM, Keba wrote:
Proposal "No Voting Limit Timing Scams" (AI=2, II=1, distributable via
fee)
{{{
Amend Rule 2279 "Voting Limits on Ordinary Decisions" by replacing
Take the Influence Level associated with the player's position
on the list of succession, or 5 if the player is the Speaker.
with:
Take the Influence Level associated with the player's position
on the list of succession at the beginning of this week, or 5 if
the player is the Speaker.
[It would be much easier to track then and it should avoid most timing
scams.]
}}}
It would not alleviate timing scams in the slightest. Just do it before the
Sunday during the voting period of the decision, rather than before the end
of the voting period.
-coppro
Woulsn't it remove the Assessor's ability to influence timing scams,
by making eir choice of when to resolve the decision meaningless for
this prupose?
It's already meaningless. Voting limits are locked at the end of the
voting period.
-coppro
