G. wrote: > Therefore, in light of this complete silence, I use the powers granted > me by R217, and state that it is (a) for the good of the game; (b) in > keeping with game custom; and (c) in keeping with the primacy of R754(2) > definitional clauses (if "definitions" are extended to "descriptions"), > to assume, prima facie, that when a document defers to other descriptions > without stating a location for the descriptions, or while stating > "elsewhere", that said locations must occur within the same document > unless the document explicitly delagates description abilities to some > other entity. In this case, the Rule doesn't.
Are you treating the ruleset as a single document?
