G. wrote: > On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Ed Murphy wrote: >> G. wrote: >> >>> Therefore, in light of this complete silence, I use the powers granted >>> me by R217, and state that it is (a) for the good of the game; (b) in >>> keeping with game custom; and (c) in keeping with the primacy of R754(2) >>> definitional clauses (if "definitions" are extended to "descriptions"), >>> to assume, prima facie, that when a document defers to other descriptions >>> without stating a location for the descriptions, or while stating >>> "elsewhere", that said locations must occur within the same document >>> unless the document explicitly delagates description abilities to some >>> other entity. In this case, the Rule doesn't. >> >> Are you treating the ruleset as a single document? > > I generally was; is there something that contradicts this? -G.
No, I thought you might be treating each rule as a separate document, which would be overly restrictive.
