On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, omd wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well, I'm not convinced your other message didn't work and deregister > >> everyone. Your ratification thing leaves the game in a slightly > >> different state if it did. > > > > Resolution of this one first will render the issue moot (I think?) > > Not quite: for example, if any of this ratification stuff ends up > causing Yally to become Pariah (after not being a player for a while), > e will then (after ratification) be awarded 23 new rests.
I don't think the ratification causes anyone to become anything new; it ratifies that a past message wasn't sent and so that any states are continuous in terms of gamestate. > >> > I win by Clout. > >> > >> No you don't. You need a win announcement. > > > > I'm not sure which part of a win announcement is missing in that statement, > > but I won't push it. > > You didn't say anything about a specified player's voting limit on an > ordinary decision with a blah blah blah. Counterargument: saying "clout" is sufficient and unambiguous shorthand for same. Not convinced either way. -G.
