ehird wrote: > On 19 April 2011 20:11, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> Here's the timing of relevant events. Â All times are UTC, and subject >> to the usual minor fuzziness involved in e-mail transmission. > > I change my vote on proposal 7017 to AGAINST, because it'd be > violating a false document no matter what the gamestate is.
I didn't intend the statement-to-be-ratified to state that omd was continuously registered for *only* that period of time, but *at least* that period. If it fails, I'll re-submit with "at least" inserted.
