omd wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:10 PM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 7020 3  Quazie     Hillary Rodham Clinton >> PRESENT > > I change my vote to FOR if way too many overly complex conditional > votes have been submitted recently, otherwise AGAINST.
I also missed this one, which is (a) ambiguous anyway and (b) wouldn't affect the overall result either way. I'm leaving the Assessor DB unchanged (e previously voted PRESENT), on the assumption that "I change my vote to <ambiguous value>" fails to change anything.
