On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Elliott Hird <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 18 April 2011 03:06, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> replace candidate with first-class candidate and i think its right. >> >> The president is much harder to get to vote. > > Good. It'd be a terrible recordkeeper. > > (But good point, it should default to voting for that candidate if > they don't vote themselves.)
I disagree with that last point. I was a candidate in the recent Scorekeepor election, and at the moment, I don't know if I won or not. It would have been better for the game (and my reputation) if I had lost, since I'm busy and have no intention to carry out the office's duties. The fact that I didn't vote in that election could have been taken as an indication that I wasn't paying attention. —Tanner L. Swett, runaway Scorekeepor candidate
