On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Tanner Swett wrote: > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Elliott Hird > <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On 18 April 2011 03:06, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> replace candidate with first-class candidate and i think its right. > >> > >> The president is much harder to get to vote. > > > > Good. It'd be a terrible recordkeeper. > > > > (But good point, it should default to voting for that candidate if > > they don't vote themselves.) > > I disagree with that last point. I was a candidate in the recent > Scorekeepor election, and at the moment, I don't know if I won or not. > It would have been better for the game (and my reputation) if I had > lost, since I'm busy and have no intention to carry out the office's > duties. The fact that I didn't vote in that election could have been > taken as an indication that I wasn't paying attention. > > —Tanner L. Swett, runaway Scorekeepor candidate
If you accepted your nomination you deserve what you get.
