On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > I intend to deputize to Rotate the Bench.
> >
> > Hmm.
> >
> > Proto-CFJ for discussion (not CFJ for obvious reasons - need a justiciar!):
> >
> > It is possible to deputize to Rotate The Bench.
> 
> CFJ 1776 states (using dated terminology) that it is possible to
> deputise for the purpose of rotating the bench as long as there is
> indeed a practical requirement to rotate the bench.

That's a very nice precedent, not dated at all when phrased as "if an
officer can be punished as the net result of not doing something, 
doing it is a requirement."  thx.  -G.



Reply via email to