On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Charles Walker wrote: > On 28 June 2011 07:45, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > > (As you might guess, this is a Spelunking entry.) > > CoE: I don't think it is. The proposal does not attempt to amend or > repeal any goals, it isn't a CFJ and your game actions did not > critically rely on any of the goals. The same goes for omd's entry (if > it is supposed to be an entry).
You are strictly correct, but I hope Agora lets me interpret this liberally. omd and Murphy's attempts make it clear that these are delves (by quote or direct statement) and the rules in question are readily interpretable. Still, to be safe, both omd and Murphy can "finish their series of moves" by announcing the rule # after the fact. I'll try to amend the regulations slightly. -G.
