On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 09:22 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Calling this a delve, too? (seems a shame not to cite R2338 in the arguments > to do so). -G.
I hadn't particularly planned to, but I don't really see why not. I'm not sure it's a massively good delve, as it depends more on 2337 than 2338. (Perhaps remove the restriction of citations altogether, and just have the Delvor decide what should be a delve and what shouldn't?) -- ais523
