On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 09:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I think you're right that your case isn't the "best" delve, but think it's > good > to encourage the spirit of "choosing that Goal got someone to re-read that > rule > carefully, and led to a case" (you re-read Promises in general because of the > goal choice, right?)
I'd actually been considering that scam for a while; the goal choice is what reminded me of it, though, and made me call the CFJ in the hope of getting a precedent that it didn't work (it'd be kind-of bad for the game if it did). -- ais523
