On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Eric Stucky <turiski.no...@gmail.com> wrote: > Someone who is sleeping may not be a person, but they have certainly been > both a person and a first-class person at some point, so there's nothing > wrong with loosening the requirements to: > A player who is not a person and has never been a person CAN be > deregistered by any player by announcement.
This could just be "who has never been a person", but again, the purpose of this was to be able to deregister second-class persons which had ceased to become persons by ceasing to satisfy the eligibility requirements. This could still be useful today if R2328 were ever used: an agreement formerly satisfying the criteria could be amended to no longer indicate that it was intended to be a person, among other possibilities.
