On Jul 23, 2011, at 11:07 AM, omd wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Eric Stucky <turiski.no...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Someone who is sleeping may not be a person, but they have certainly been >> both a person and a first-class person at some point, so there's nothing >> wrong with loosening the requirements to: >> A player who is not a person and has never been a person CAN be >> deregistered by any player by announcement. > > This could just be "who has never been a person", but again, the > purpose of this was to be able to deregister second-class persons > which had ceased to become persons by ceasing to satisfy the > eligibility requirements.
I understand that; that's why my sentence concluded with > if that's the only thing you're concerned about. -Turiski
