On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> *7111 1.0 Tanner L. Points for the Big Guy >> *7115 1.0 Tanner L. Relax / Stroke Hell > > CoE: not that either of these would have any effect due to > insufficient AI, but these proposals with these purported AIs never > existed and thus weren't distributed.
Actually, I'm pretty sure these proposals were still validly distributed, even with the incorrectly listed AI, because nobody CoEd the distribution within 7 days. They proceeded to fail.
