On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, omd wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > > Purported distributions don't self-ratify. Purported resolutions do > > (R2034), including (for decisions on proposals) the implicit claim that > > the proposal exists. > > The rule which would invalidate it for missing essential parameters is > R107, which includes the "lack is correctly identified within one > week" clause.
Hm, not exactly. For a Decision to be initiated by R107, both: (1) The initiator must be authorized to initiate it; (2) The essential parameters must be included. The essential parameters "ratify" if not identified. However, the fact that the initiator is/isn't authorized to initiate a particular decision isn't an essential parameter. Since the Promotor isn't authorized to initiate a decision for a nonexistent proposal, that part doesn't ratify. -G.
