On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Tanner Swett <swe...@mail.gvsu.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Wes Contreras <w...@antitribu.com> wrote: > > Can anyone explain why Second-Class Players exist? Because they > > significantly complicate the Rules without any apparent benefit. > > Simply put: the rules about second-class players are there because we > have, from time to time, had second-class players (only partnerships, > as far as I remember), and so it's likely that we'll need those > mechanisms in the future. > > —Machiavelli > > Canada and Agora have both been second-class players. I wouldn't go so far as to say that they participated, though. -scshunt
