Roujo wrote:
Thanks, guys, that makes sense. I change my vote on Proposal 7389 to AGAINST, if that's possible.
It is, Rule 683 (d).
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Propo... Tysger B.
- DIS: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distrib... Tanner Swett
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of ... Kerim Aydin
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of ... Kerim Aydin
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of ... Alex Smith
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of ... Kerim Aydin
- DIS: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Dis... Elliott Hird
- DIS: Re: DIS: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [... Kerim Aydin
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Prom... Ed Murphy
- DIS: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: R... Jonathan Rouillard
- DIS: Re: DIS: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: DI... Tanner Swett
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of ... Sean Hunt
- DIS: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Dis... Wes Contreras
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of ... Ed Murphy
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of ... Sean Hunt
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of ... omd
