On 11 June 2013 20:13, Tanner Swett <swe...@mail.gvsu.edu> wrote: > It could be argued that if the rules contained a self-contradictory > statement of this nature, then the entire ruleset would be effectively > meaningless and unusable, because, by the principle of explosion, all > statements would be both true and false. This view doesn't seem to be > actually held by anyone in Agora, but if it were Agora's preferred > interpretation, then the statement "It is LEGAL to shout 'CREAMPUFF' > if and only if it is ILLEGAL to shout 'CREAMPUFF'" would be both true > and false, and so under this view, the answer to the CFJ is FALSE.
I hold this view, but recognise that Agoran tradition is to collectively lie to ourselves in order to not admit you've broken the game. I miss B.
