On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
I meant "buggy requirement" as a hypothetical in my quote (as in, "satisfies the requirement if it's bugged").FWIW, I meant omd's interpretation when I wrote the rule originally. Not that that really counts for anything. (And not that either interpretation is obviously broken.)
Before Steve pointed out the ambiguity, I also read it with omd's interpretation.
Greetings, Ørjan.
