On Fri, 10 Jan 2014, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Rule 683 (emphasis mine)
>
> An *eligible voter* on a particular Agoran decision submits a
> ballot to the vote collector by publishing a valid notice
> indicating which one of the available options e selects.
>
> To me, this implies that only an eligible voter can "vote on", but it
> may be invalid for another reason.
So an eligible voter voting CREAMPUFF counts towards quorum, but a
non-eligible voter's "votes" don't. Makes sense.
Which means, in passing, that AGAINT is now a synonym for PRESENT...
