On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > On 7 February 2014 05:43, Aaron Goldfein <aarongoldf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > >> > >> The existence and current interpretation of R104 directly > >> demonstrates, via a current Rule, that a "game" ended in the > >> past while Agora continued. > >> > >> (And you thought we just kept that around for fun). > > > > > > Either that or Michael Norrish is currently the speaker. > > > > Just because assuming Michael Norrish is not the speaker would lead to > a contradiction, we don't have proof that e is the speaker.
It's actually settled law (supported by factual evidence) that the First Game ended, a new Speaker took the position, and Agora continued. (it's documented in at least one CFJ; no database up right now so don't remember which one). -G.
