On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 00:44 +0000, omd wrote:
> You could have said so. :) But I don't think that works, because
> there was no Referee to be obligated at the time; the deputisation
> rule talks about hypothetical obligations, but the office
> hypothetically being filled at the time of deputisation is unrelated
> to the state of affairs the previous week.
There is always the Referee (as an office), even when there is no
officeholder. I believe the (real, not hypothetical) obligation was
the office's, despite its vacancy. E.g. CFJ 2437?
My deputisation was supposed to:
- be effective via the unfulfilled obligation (of the vacant
office),
- cite the rule violation thus commited by the office, but
- issue a Card to the new officeholder.
