On Sun, 12 Jul 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This email contains two --- delimited Messages.
>
> This portion, at least, is INEFFECTIVE:
>
> A rule can also designate that a part of one public
> message is considered a public message in its own right.
>
> This implies that a player CANNOT do so.
Feel free to call a CFJ. I disagree:
1. Designating is not the same as permitting in R2125.
2. There is no clear delineation in the rules that "messages"
are bounded by email containers.
3. Definition: "A message is a discrete unit of communication
intended by the source for consumption by some recipient or group
of recipients." Now, let's take this definition. Let's say
my "pair of messages" in a single email are directed at two
different Officers. Different intended recipients = different
messages by the definition.
4. If PoA currently works where the rules are silent, then we
have to infer multiple messages in one email (one from the
Agent, one from the Principal). Your interpretation would
firmly break PoA if it exists now (not that it's bad, but it
is a consequence).
-G.
