On Sun, 12 Jul 2015, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > 4. If PoA currently works where the rules are silent, then we > > have to infer multiple messages in one email (one from the > > Agent, one from the Principal). Your interpretation would > > firmly break PoA if it exists now (not that it's bad, but it > > is a consequence). > > I'm very strongly of the opinion that it doesn't function now. It's a > case of ISIDTID; without the rules enabling it in some form, it > doesn't work.
Fair enough. I'm personally undecided (actually, I think the way to put it is: it would take a re-analysis of the 2006-2007 cases for me to have an opinion - it was found to work without enablement at that time).
