On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 17:02 +0100, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Alex Smith wrote: > > > I actually got two objection emails from Gaelan and they both went to > > a-d. > > Actually not, the last one just has a deceptive To: header. > > Greetings, > Ørjan.
Ugh. Is Received: enough to tell which list the message was actually sent via? Or do we have to check the list archives for every single message to make sure it was actually sent? I'm worried about a scam where someone makes a contract/promise-like statement "to a-b" but it's actually sent via a-d with a forged To: header, and later goes back on it on the basis that it wasn't sent via a public forum. -- ais523
