On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 16:09:55 +0000 Alex Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 17:02 +0100, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Alex Smith wrote: > > > > > I actually got two objection emails from Gaelan and they both > > > went to a-d. > > > > Actually not, the last one just has a deceptive To: header. > > > > Greetings, > > Ørjan. > > Ugh. Is Received: enough to tell which list the message was actually > sent via? Or do we have to check the list archives for every single > message to make sure it was actually sent? > > I'm worried about a scam where someone makes a contract/promise-like > statement "to a-b" but it's actually sent via a-d with a forged To: > header, and later goes back on it on the basis that it wasn't sent > via a public forum. > Filtering via the List-Id header is probably the best way. -- aranea
