I like the idea of bringing back the fearmonger and making the waived fee a gig.
On Wednesday, April 19, 2017, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > Minor point of order for new folks: > > We've historically promoted bottom-posting for replies (with editing of > past > thread pieces allowed). Unfortunately not well-supported by current email > clients. I mildly prefer bottom-posting for things like judicial threads > with > counter arguments. Ultimately, I don't mind either way, but the > combination of > different people using both bottom and top-posting makes these longer > threads a > bit challenging to follow :) > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Quazie wrote: > > I quite like making this idea a gig as well. > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:54 Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > Agreed, and that should apply to everyone, not just the Speaker. > Want to make the whole thing a gig? > > > > -Aris > > > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:55 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > Also, maybe a rule that waives the shiny fee on pending a > proposal, if the pool has been empty for a certain length of > > time. > > > > ----Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > A solid +1. Theme proposals encouraged? > > -- ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
