That’s pretty much it. You’re best-placed to actually provide insight into the truthiness of the statement, which is why I barred you: I’m actually trying to figure out how Agora as a whole interprets the 蘭亭社 charter. Having you step in and answer directly somewhat defeats the purpose.
-o > On Apr 27, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This sounds like an issue where I sit on the sideline and eat popcorn and > maybe attempt to correct if everyone is horribly off-mark. Wonderful. > > On 27 April 2017 at 02:46, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk > <mailto:ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk>> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 02:43 -0400, Josh T wrote: > > I am confused by the wording "barring 天火狐", and seek clarification > > on the issue. > > When you call a CFJ, you can choose one player who will not be able to > judge that CFJ; that's called "barring a player". Normally you do that > if the CFJ is about that player or something that that player is > associated with (to avoid conflicts of interest), or if the eligibility > of the player to judge the CFJ would depend on the result of the CFJ. > However, you don't have to state your reason, and there doesn't even > have to be a reason. > > -- > ais523 >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP