That’s pretty much it. You’re best-placed to actually provide insight into the 
truthiness of the statement, which is why I barred you: I’m actually trying to 
figure out how Agora as a whole interprets the 蘭亭社 charter. Having you step in 
and answer directly somewhat defeats the purpose.

-o

> On Apr 27, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> This sounds like an issue where I sit on the sideline and eat popcorn and 
> maybe attempt to correct if everyone is horribly off-mark. Wonderful.
> 
> On 27 April 2017 at 02:46, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk 
> <mailto:ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk>> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 02:43 -0400, Josh T wrote:
> > I am confused by the wording "barring 天火狐", and seek clarification
> > on the issue.
> 
> When you call a CFJ, you can choose one player who will not be able to
> judge that CFJ; that's called "barring a player". Normally you do that
> if the CFJ is about that player or something that that player is
> associated with (to avoid conflicts of interest), or if the eligibility
> of the player to judge the CFJ would depend on the result of the CFJ.
> However, you don't have to state your reason, and there doesn't even
> have to be a reason.
> 
> --
> ais523
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to