Ha - I like this assignment, as I know o's feelings on this, given the actions e took. It will be interesting to see if e reconsiders, or if we, as agora, disagree with whatever decision e makes.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:20 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Detail: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/3477 > > ============================= CFJ 3477 ============================= > > Assuming that Quazie is a player, e has, within the past week, > exceeded the Income Cap. > > ====================================================================== > > Caller: Aris > > Judge: o > Judgement: > > ====================================================================== > > History: > > Called by Aris: 22 Apr 2017 > Assigned to o: as of this message > > ====================================================================== > > Caller's Arguments: > > "Allowable" could mean either "possible" or "permissible". If it's the > later, e has not exceeded the Cap, as the highest permissible value is > the highest value e could not be punished for. Additionally, if the > action is ambiguous between the two (or otherwise ambiguous) then it > is insufficiently clear to be valid. > > ====================================================================== > > Caller's Evidence: > > > ====================================================================== > >
